Music and Copyright Matters: Mr. Steinsapir has handled scores of legal issues for the Estate of Michael Jackson in the last fifteen years and has litigated issues involving all aspects of Jackson’s career from his work with the Jackson Five through his tragic death in 2009. He advises the Estate on music and other intellectual property issues on a weekly, and often daily, basis. He has handled dozens of litigations, arbitrations, and pre-litigation disputes for the Jackson Estate and other music industry clients and in other copyright matters.
Trademark and Unfair Competition Matters: Mr. Steinsapir has extensive experience litigating trademark, trade dress, false advertising, trade secret, and unfair competition matters in state and federal courts.
Patent Matters: Mr. Steinsapir represents patentees and accused infringers in patent cases. He has argued dispositive motions and Markman issues in federal courts in California, Texas, Nevada, and Connecticut.
Appellate: In the last few years, Mr. Steinsapir has handled numerous appellate matters, arguing over a dozen appeals in the U.S. Courts of Appeals (in the Ninth and Eleventh Circuits) and in the California Court of Appeal. He has also worked on matters in the U.S. Supreme Court, the California Supreme Court and other federal Circuit Courts of Appeals. Among many others, all of the following appeals were argued by Mr. Steinsapir: Optimum Productions v. Home Box Office, 839 Fed. Appx. 75 (9th Cir. 2020) (affirming order compelling the Estate of Michael Jackson’s claims against HBO to arbitration under a 1992 agreement prohibiting HBO’s disparagement of Jackson); Kroma Makeup EU v. Boldface Licensing & Branding, 920 F.3d 704 (11th Cir. 2019) (affirming summary judgment of no trademark infringement in clients’ favor); 2Die4Kourt v. Hillair Capital Management, 692 Fed.Appx. 366 (9th Cir. 2017) (affirming preliminary injunction in clients’ favor); Kroma Makeup EU v. Boldface Licensing & Branding, 845 F.3d 1351 (11th Cir. 2017) (addressing issue of first impression regarding equitable estoppel on motion to compel arbitration); Jaycee Dugard v. United States, 835 F.3d 915 (9th Cir. 2016) (argued kidnapping victim Jaycee Dugard’s claims against the Federal Government); Ross v. O’Neal, 525 Fed. Appx. 600 (9th Cir. 2013) (holding that California statute was unconstitutional as applied to firm client, Shaquille O’Neal); MVP Entertainment, Inc. v. Frost, 210 Cal. App. 4th 1333 (2012) (obtaining affirmance of trial court’s ruling in client’s favor); Frost v. Frederick, 466 Fed. Appx. 604 (9th Cir. 2012) (obtaining reversal of federal district court’s ruling against client).
Probate and Related Issues
On August 21, 2024, the California Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s ruling approving of a joint venture deal between the Estate of Michael Jackson and a third party,...
Partners Chad Fitzgerald, Shawn Holley, Larry Iser, Dale Kinsella, Kat Kleindienst, Greg Korn, Alan Kossoff, Michael Kump, Suann MacIsaac, Amber Melius, Patricia Millett, Allen Secretov, Nick Soltman, Kristen Spanier, and...
The firm is proud to announce that partners Shawn Holley, Michael Kump, and Jonathan Steinsapir have been named by Variety in its 2024 “Legal Impact Report.” This report annually profiles...
The firm is pleased to announce that Larry Iser and Jonathan Steinsapir have been selected to Billboard’s prestigious “Top Music Lawyers” list for 2024. Each year, the list profiles a...
For the past two years, KHIKS partners Michael Kump, Jonathan Steinsapir and Nicholas Soltman have represented Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, in a defamation action filed by her half-sister in...
Jonathan Steinsapir and Allen Secretov obtained the dismissal with prejudice of a federal lawsuit challenging the validity of dozens of copyright termination notices relating to the works of the legendary...